เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| การศึกษาเฉพาะกรณีวิกฤต× | การศึกษาเปรียบเทียบกรณีศึกษา× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | เชิงคุณภาพ | เชิงคุณภาพ |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1980s–2006 (formalized) | 1984 (Yin); 1995 (Stake) |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Bent Flyvbjerg (formalized); Robert K. Yin (case study typology) | Robert K. Yin; Robert E. Stake |
| ประเภท≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative / mixed research design |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. DOI ↗ | Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506336169 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | critical case, strategic case study, critical-instance case study, paradigmatic case study | cross-case study, multi-site case study, multiple case study design, comparative case analysis |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 6 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | A critical case study is a case study design in which the researcher deliberately selects a case that is strategically important for testing, confirming, challenging, or extending an existing proposition, theory, or policy claim. Rather than choosing a typical or representative case, the researcher argues that if the finding holds here — in this most-likely, least-likely, or paradigmatic instance — it can reasonably be expected to hold more broadly. This purposive logic transforms a single case into a powerful analytical tool. | Comparative case study is a qualitative research design in which two or more bounded cases are studied in depth and then systematically compared to identify similarities, differences, and patterns across contexts. Rooted in Yin's replication logic and Stake's multiple case framework, it is particularly suited to questions that ask how or why a phenomenon unfolds differently — or similarly — across distinct settings, populations, or time periods. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|