เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	ชาติพันธุ์วรรณนาเชิงสถาบันเปรียบเทียบ	การวิเคราะห์เนื้อหาเชิงคุณภาพเชิงเปรียบเทียบ
สาขาวิชา	เชิงคุณภาพ	เชิงคุณภาพ
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	1987 (IE origin); comparative applications developed 1990s–2000s	1983 (Mayring's QCA foundation); comparative adaptations prominent from 2000s onward
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Dorothy E. Smith (IE foundation); comparative extension by subsequent IE scholars	Philipp Mayring (qualitative content analysis); comparative application developed across communication, policy, and social science research
ประเภท	Qualitative multi-site institutional design	Qualitative research design and analysis strategy
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105508	Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. Sage. ISBN: 978-0857029201
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	CIE, comparative IE, multi-site institutional ethnography, cross-institutional ethnography	comparative QCA, cross-case qualitative content analysis, multi-context qualitative content analysis, comparative interpretive content analysis
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	5	4
สรุป	Comparative Institutional Ethnography (CIE) extends Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography to two or more institutional settings, revealing how texts, ruling relations, and coordinated work practices operate across different organizational contexts. By holding the standpoint of workers or clients constant while varying the institutional site, CIE exposes both the shared ideological mechanisms and the local divergences that shape everyday experience within institutions such as hospitals, schools, welfare agencies, or courts.	Comparative qualitative content analysis (comparative QCA) applies a systematic, category-driven reading of texts or documents across two or more cases, groups, time periods, or cultural contexts, with the explicit goal of identifying similarities, differences, and patterns that emerge from the comparison. It combines the interpretive rigour of qualitative content analysis with a structured comparative logic, making it valuable for cross-national policy research, media studies, and any inquiry that requires principled comparison of meaning across contexts.