ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Comparative Historical Analysis×Most Different Systems Design×
สาขาวิชาPolitical SciencePolitical Science
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด19791970
ผู้ริเริ่มTheda Skocpol, Barrington Moore, James Mahoney & Dietrich Rueschemeyer (tradition)John Stuart Mill (method of agreement); Przeworski & Teune (systems framing)
ประเภทMacro-causal, case-based comparative method with temporal emphasisSmall-N comparative case-selection design
แหล่งต้นตำรับMahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.) (2003). Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521016452Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
ชื่อเรียกอื่นCHA, Macro-causal analysis, Historical-comparative method, Comparative historical sociologyMDSD, Most different cases design, Mill's method of agreement, Diverse systems design
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง43
สรุปComparative historical analysis (CHA) is a macro-causal research tradition that explains large-scale outcomes — revolutions, regime change, welfare states, development paths — by systematically comparing a small number of cases reconstructed in depth across historical time. It combines cross-case comparison with close attention to temporality: sequences, timing, critical junctures, and path dependence. Associated with Barrington Moore, Theda Skocpol, and codified by Mahoney and Rueschemeyer, CHA treats history not as background but as the medium through which causes operate.The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Comparative Historical Analysis · Most Different Systems Design. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-24 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare