เปรียบเทียบวิธี

	CollaboRATE Shared Decision Making Scale	แบบวัดความขัดแย้งในการตัดสินใจ
สาขาวิชา	การดูแลที่ยึดผู้ป่วยเป็นศูนย์กลาง	การดูแลที่ยึดผู้ป่วยเป็นศูนย์กลาง
ตระกูล	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด	2013	1995
ผู้ริเริ่ม	Glyn Elwyn	Annette O'Connor
ประเภท	Patient-reported	Patient-reported
แหล่งต้นตำรับ	Elwyn, G., Barr, P. J., Grande, S. W., Thompson, R., Walsh, T., & Ozanne, E. M. (2013). Developing CollaboRATE: A fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Education and Counseling, 93(1), 102-107.	O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Medical Decision Making, 15(1), 25-30.
ชื่อเรียกอื่น	Collaborative Therapeutic Engagement Scale	DCS-16, Decisional Conflict Inventory
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง	4	4
สรุป	CollaboRATE is a three-item patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess shared decision making (SDM) quality in clinical consultations. Developed by Glyn Elwyn and colleagues in 2013, it measures the degree to which clinicians involve patients in decisions about their care through simple, actionable items that are easy to administer and interpret. The scale has become a standard benchmark for evaluating SDM implementation in healthcare systems.	The Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) is a 16-item self-reported outcome measure that quantifies the degree of uncertainty, value ambivalence, and decision distress experienced by patients facing healthcare choices. Developed by Annette O'Connor in 1995, the DCS assesses five core domains: personal uncertainty, understanding of options and outcomes, clarity of personal values, perceived social support, and confidence in making the decision. It has become the gold standard for measuring decisional conflict in healthcare research and clinical trials of decision support interventions.