ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Clinical Significance Analysis×Standardized Clinical Cutoff×
สาขาวิชาSocial WorkSocial Work
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด19911991
ผู้ริเริ่มNeil S. Jacobson & Paula TruaxNeil S. Jacobson & Paula Truax
ประเภทTwo-part classification of whether individual change is both reliable and meaningfulMethod for judging whether individual change on a standardized measure is reliable and clinically meaningful
แหล่งต้นตำรับJacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI ↗
ชื่อเรียกอื่นClinical Significance, Jacobson-Truax Method, Clinically Significant Change, Recovery ClassificationClinical Cutoff Score, Clinical Significance Method, Reliable Change Index, Jacobson-Truax Method
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง43
สรุปClinical significance analysis is a method for deciding whether an individual client's change after treatment is not only statistically reliable but also meaningful in real-world terms — specifically, whether the client has moved out of the dysfunctional range and into the range typical of a functional or non-clinical population. Formalized by Neil Jacobson and Paula Truax in 1991, it combines a reliable-change criterion with a clinical cutoff to sort each client into categories such as recovered, improved, unchanged, or deteriorated, complementing group-level statistics that say nothing about individual benefit.The standardized clinical cutoff approach, developed by Jacobson and Truax, judges whether an individual client's change on a standardized measure is both statistically reliable and clinically meaningful. It pairs a Reliable Change Index — which asks whether a pre-to-post change is larger than the measurement error of the instrument — with a cutoff score that marks the boundary between the dysfunctional and functional (normal) populations. A client who moves reliably across that cutoff is counted as recovered, giving practice and research a defensible, individual-level definition of meaningful improvement.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Clinical Significance Analysis · Standardized Clinical Cutoff. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare