เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Candidate Evaluation Model× | Feeling Thermometer Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | จิตวิทยาการเมือง | จิตวิทยาการเมือง |
| ตระกูล≠ | Latent structure | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1995 | 1964 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Milton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald Kinder | American National Election Studies / Aage Clausen |
| ประเภท≠ | Latent evaluation model | Affect rating instrument |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗ | Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗ |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | Impression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation Model | Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating Scale |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 4 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives. | The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|