ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Angoff Standard Setting×Bookmark Standard Setting×
สาขาวิชาEducationEducation
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด19712001
ผู้ริเริ่มWilliam H. AngoffHoward Mitzel, Daniel Lewis, Richard Patz & Donald Ross Green (CTB/McGraw-Hill)
ประเภทTest-centered standard-setting procedure for establishing cut scoresIRT-based standard-setting procedure using ordered item booklets
แหล่งต้นตำรับCizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820Cizek, G. J., & Bunch, M. B. (2007). Standard Setting: A Guide to Establishing and Evaluating Performance Standards on Tests. Sage. ISBN: 9781412916820
ชื่อเรียกอื่นAngoff Method, Modified Angoff Method, Yes/No Angoff, Angoff Cut-Score ProcedureBookmark Method, Bookmark Procedure, Item Mapping Standard Setting, Ordered Item Booklet Method
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง33
สรุปThe Angoff method is a test-centered procedure for establishing a passing score (cut score) on an examination. A panel of content experts conceptualizes a 'borderline' or minimally competent examinee and, for each item, estimates the probability that such an examinee would answer it correctly. Summing those probabilities yields a recommended cut score for each panelist, and averaging across panelists and discussion rounds produces the performance standard. It is among the most widely used standard-setting methods in licensure, certification, and K-12 testing.The Bookmark method is an item-response-theory-based standard-setting procedure in which test items are arranged in a booklet ordered from easiest to hardest. Panelists page through this ordered item booklet and place a 'bookmark' at the point separating items a borderline examinee would likely master from those they would not, judged against a fixed response probability (commonly two-thirds). The latent ability at the bookmark defines the cut score. Developed at CTB/McGraw-Hill, it became one of the dominant methods for large-scale K-12 assessments.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Angoff Standard Setting · Bookmark Standard Setting. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-24 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare