เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Agroecosystem Analysis× | Rural Livelihood Diversification Index× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | Food Agriculture Studies | Food Agriculture Studies |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1987 | 2000 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Gordon R. Conway | Frank Ellis (rural livelihoods framework) |
| ประเภท≠ | Systems-diagnosis pipeline for agroecosystem performance | Descriptive concentration/diversity index pipeline for income sources |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Conway, G. R. (1987). The properties of agroecosystems. Agricultural Systems, 24(2), 95-117. DOI ↗ | Ellis, F. (2000). Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780198296966 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | AEA, Agroecosystem Properties Analysis, Conway Agroecosystem Analysis, Agroecosystem Diagnosis | Livelihood Diversification Index, Income Diversification Index, Simpson Index of Income Diversification, Herfindahl Diversification Measure |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง≠ | 4 | 3 |
| สรุป≠ | Agroecosystem analysis (AEA) is a systems-diagnosis framework, formalized by Gordon Conway in 1987, that characterizes any agricultural system through four properties: productivity, stability, sustainability, and equitability. Rather than judging a farming system by yield alone, AEA treats the agroecosystem as an ecological system shaped by human management and asks how much it produces, how reliably it produces it across seasons and shocks, whether it can maintain output over the long run, and how its benefits are distributed among the people who depend on it. The analyst bounds a system at an appropriate hierarchical level — plot, field, farm, watershed, or region — and uses interdisciplinary teams, ranked questions, and simple structured diagrams to surface the key relationships and the trade-offs among the four properties that drive design and policy choices. | A rural livelihood diversification index summarises, in a single number, how spread out a household's income is across different sources and activities — farming, off-farm wage labour, self-employment, remittances, transfers — rather than concentrated in one. Grounded in Frank Ellis's rural livelihoods framework, which defines diversification as the process by which rural households construct an increasingly diverse portfolio of activities to survive and improve their living standards, the index borrows concentration measures such as the Herfindahl and its Simpson complement from ecology and industrial economics. A household relying wholly on one crop scores as undiversified and exposed; one drawing evenly on many sources scores as highly diversified and, often, more resilient. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|