เปรียบเทียบวิธี
ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้
| Advocacy Coalition Framework× | Policy Network Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| สาขาวิชา | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| ตระกูล | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| ปีกำเนิด≠ | 1993 | 1992 |
| ผู้ริเริ่ม≠ | Paul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith | R. A. W. Rhodes & David Marsh (British school); broader governance-network tradition |
| ประเภท≠ | Theory of the policy process | Analysis of inter-organisational policy relationships |
| แหล่งต้นตำรับ≠ | Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499 | Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198278528 |
| ชื่อเรียกอื่น | ACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach | Policy Networks, Governance Network Analysis, Policy Network Approach |
| ที่เกี่ยวข้อง | 4 | 4 |
| สรุป≠ | The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them. | Policy network analysis examines policymaking as the product of relationships among interdependent actors — government agencies, interest groups, experts and others — who exchange resources such as information, money, legitimacy and authority. In the influential British tradition associated with R. A. W. Rhodes and David Marsh, policy networks range along a continuum from tightly knit, exclusive 'policy communities' to loose, open 'issue networks', and the type of network is held to shape policy outcomes. More broadly, the approach applies the concepts and tools of social-network analysis to governance, treating the structure of ties among actors as a key explanatory variable. |
| ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล ↗ |
|
|