ScholarGate
ผู้ช่วย

เปรียบเทียบวิธี

ดูวิธีที่เลือกเทียบกันแบบเคียงข้าง แถวที่ต่างกันจะถูกเน้นไว้

Adaptive Capacity Assessment×CPR Design-Principle Diagnostics×
สาขาวิชาEnvironmental SociologyEnvironmental Sociology
ตระกูลProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
ปีกำเนิด20061990
ผู้ริเริ่มBarry Smit & Johanna Wandel; IPCC (Adger et al.)Elinor Ostrom; reviewed and refined by Michael Cox, Gwen Arnold & Sergio Villamayor-Tomas
ประเภทParticipatory, determinants-based assessment of the capacity to adaptDiagnostic checklist for robustness of common-pool resource institutions
แหล่งต้นตำรับSmit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, Adaptive Capacity and Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 282-292. DOI ↗Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521405997
ชื่อเรียกอื่นAdaptive Capacity Appraisal, Capacity-to-Adapt Assessment, Vulnerability-Based Adaptation Assessment, Determinants of Adaptive Capacity AnalysisDesign Principles Diagnostics, Commons Design Principles Analysis, Ostrom Design Principles, Robust CPR Institution Diagnostics
ที่เกี่ยวข้อง43
สรุปAdaptive capacity assessment evaluates the ability of a community, sector, or system to adjust to climate variability and change, to moderate harm, and to seize opportunities. It is the third and most actionable component of the IPCC vulnerability framework, the part that captures why two equally exposed and sensitive places can fare very differently. Barry Smit and Johanna Wandel's influential synthesis reframed vulnerability assessment around adaptive capacity and argued for a bottom-up, practitioner-oriented approach grounded in local knowledge of real exposures and coping. The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report chapter on adaptation, by Adger and colleagues, catalogued the determinants of adaptive capacity, economic resources, technology, information, infrastructure, institutions, and equity, and the barriers that limit it in practice. Rather than producing a single index number, the assessment builds a rich, context-specific picture of what enables and constrains adaptation. Its purpose is to identify concrete entry points for strengthening the capacity to cope with a changing climate.Common-pool resource (CPR) diagnostics evaluate a self-governing commons against the design principles that Elinor Ostrom, in Governing the Commons (1990), found to characterize long-enduring institutions for managing shared resources. A common-pool resource is one from which it is hard to exclude users but where one person's use subtracts from what is left for others, creating dilemmas of overuse and underprovision. Ostrom's comparison of irrigation systems, fisheries, forests, and grazing commons that had survived for generations against those that had collapsed yielded eight design principles, from clearly defined boundaries and rules matched to local conditions, through collective-choice arrangements, monitoring, graduated sanctions, and conflict resolution, to recognized rights to organize and nested enterprises. A later systematic review by Cox, Arnold, and Villamayor-Tomas confirmed and refined these principles. The method uses them as a diagnostic checklist to assess and explain the robustness of commons institutions.
ScholarGateชุดข้อมูล
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 แหล่งอ้างอิง
  3. PUBLISHED

ไปที่หน้าค้นหา ดาวน์โหลดสไลด์

ScholarGateเปรียบเทียบวิธี: Adaptive Capacity Assessment · CPR Design-Principle Diagnostics. สืบค้นเมื่อ 2026-06-25 จาก https://scholargate.app/th/compare