ScholarGate
Msaidizi
Process / pipelineDigital controversy cartography

Web Controversy Analysis

Web controversy analysis studies scientific, technical, and public controversies through the traces they leave online—hyperlink networks, search-engine results, and social-media activity. Building on the controversy-mapping tradition but reworking it as a web-native digital method, it follows Tommaso Venturini's call to 'build on faults' and Noortje Marres's argument for controversy analysis as a digital method, using crawling and co-link analysis to reveal how positions in a dispute are connected, opposed, and arranged across the web.

Fungua katika MethodMindHivi karibuniTumia, linganisha, pata mwongozo
Zana na rasilimali
Pakua slaidi
Jifunze na uchunguze
VideoHivi karibuni

Soma mbinu kamili

Kwa wanachama pekee

Ingia kwa akaunti ya bure ili kusoma sehemu hii.

Ingia

Ramani ya mbinu

Jirani ya mbinu zinazohusiana — chagua nodi ili kuchunguza.

Vyanzo

  1. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558
  2. Marres, N. (2015). Why map issues? On controversy analysis as a digital method. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40(5), 655-686. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915574602

Jinsi ya kunukuu ukurasa huu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Web-Based Controversy Analysis. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sw/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis

Mbinu ipi?

Weka mbinu hii kando ya jamaa zake wa karibu na uzisome bega kwa bega — maktaba huweka vitabu mezani; uamuzi ni wako.

Linganisha bega kwa bega

Imerejelewa na

ScholarGateWeb Controversy Analysis (Web-Based Controversy Analysis). Imepatikana 2026-06-24 kutoka https://scholargate.app/sw/science-technology-studies/web-controversy-analysis · Seti ya data: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026