Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Uchukuaji Sampuli wa Kimakusudi Unaotegemea Uchambuzi wa Usikivu× | Njia ya kukusanya sampuli kwa njia ya mpira wa theluji× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja | Metodolojia ya Dodoso | Metodolojia ya Dodoso |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1990s–2000s | 1961 |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | Rooted in Patton's purposive sampling typology; sensitivity analysis practices formalized in research synthesis literature | Leo A. Goodman |
| Aina≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling with robustness verification | Non-probability sampling technique |
| Chanzo asilia≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications. ISBN: 978-1412972123 | Goodman, L. A. (1961). Snowball sampling. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 32(1), 148–170. DOI ↗ |
| Majina mbadala≠ | purposive sampling with sensitivity checks, robust purposive sampling, sensitivity-tested purposive selection | chain-referral sampling, network sampling, respondent-driven sampling, referral sampling |
| Zinazohusiana≠ | 5 | 3 |
| Muhtasari≠ | Sensitivity analysis-based purposive sampling extends conventional purposive sampling by systematically testing whether key findings or case-selection decisions change when the inclusion criteria, selection logic, or boundary conditions are altered. It applies the logic of sensitivity analysis — standard in quantitative research and systematic reviews — to qualitative case selection, giving researchers explicit evidence of how robust their purposive choices are to plausible alternative selection rules. | Snowball sampling is a non-probability recruitment technique in which initial participants (seeds) refer the researcher to others who meet the study criteria, and those referrals in turn refer further participants. The sample grows incrementally — like a rolling snowball — until the required size or theoretical saturation is reached. It is the method of choice when a target population has no accessible sampling frame, such as undocumented migrants, illicit drug users, survivors of stigmatised experiences, or members of closed professional networks. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|