Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Mfumo wa Kunusurika kwa Matukio Yanayojirudia× | Uchanganuzi wa Poisson na Negative Binomial× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja≠ | Uchanganuzi wa Uhai | Ekonometriki |
| Familia≠ | Survival analysis | Regression model |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1981 | 1998 |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | Andersen & Gill (AG, 1982); Prentice, Williams & Peterson (PWP, 1981); Wei, Lin & Weissfeld (WLW, 1989) | Cameron & Trivedi (textbook treatment); Hilbe (negative binomial) |
| Aina≠ | Semi-parametric hazard model for repeated events | Generalized linear model for count data |
| Chanzo asilia≠ | Cook, R.J. & Lawless, J.F. (2007). The Statistical Analysis of Recurrent Events. Springer. DOI ↗ | Cameron, A. C. & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press. DOI ↗ |
| Majina mbadala≠ | Tekrarlayan Olay Modeli (Recurrent Events), Andersen-Gill model, AG model, Wei-Lin-Weissfeld model | count regression, log-linear count model, negative binomial regression, Poisson / Negatif Binom Regresyon |
| Zinazohusiana | 4 | 4 |
| Muhtasari≠ | A recurrent event model is a survival analysis extension, formalised through the landmark contributions of Prentice, Williams and Peterson (1981), Andersen and Gill (1982), and Wei, Lin and Weissfeld (1989), that models time-to-event data when the same event — such as a hospital readmission, disease relapse, or equipment failure — can occur multiple times in the same individual. The three principal frameworks are the Andersen-Gill (AG) model, the Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) stratified model, and the Wei-Lin-Weissfeld (WLW) marginal model, each making different assumptions about within-subject dependence. | Poisson regression is a generalized linear model for count outcomes — events tallied as non-negative integers such as hospital admissions, accidents, or article counts. It models the log of the expected count as a linear function of the predictors, and is developed in the standard count-data treatment of Cameron and Trivedi (1998); when the counts are over-dispersed, the closely related negative binomial model (Hilbe, 2011) is preferred. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|