Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Policy Network Analysis× | Advocacy Coalition Framework× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja | Public Policy | Public Policy |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1992 | 1993 |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | R. A. W. Rhodes & David Marsh (British school); broader governance-network tradition | Paul Sabatier & Hank Jenkins-Smith |
| Aina≠ | Analysis of inter-organisational policy relationships | Theory of the policy process |
| Chanzo asilia≠ | Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.) (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN: 9780198278528 | Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (Eds.) (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. ISBN: 9780813316499 |
| Majina mbadala | Policy Networks, Governance Network Analysis, Policy Network Approach | ACF, Sabatier-Jenkins-Smith Framework, Advocacy Coalition Approach |
| Zinazohusiana | 4 | 4 |
| Muhtasari≠ | Policy network analysis examines policymaking as the product of relationships among interdependent actors — government agencies, interest groups, experts and others — who exchange resources such as information, money, legitimacy and authority. In the influential British tradition associated with R. A. W. Rhodes and David Marsh, policy networks range along a continuum from tightly knit, exclusive 'policy communities' to loose, open 'issue networks', and the type of network is held to shape policy outcomes. More broadly, the approach applies the concepts and tools of social-network analysis to governance, treating the structure of ties among actors as a key explanatory variable. | The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) is a theory of the policy process developed by Paul Sabatier and Hank Jenkins-Smith from the late 1980s and consolidated in their 1993 volume Policy Change and Learning. It explains policy stability and change over long periods by analysing competing coalitions of actors within a policy subsystem who are bound together by shared beliefs. Policy change is understood as a function of the interaction among these belief-based coalitions, the policy-oriented learning that occurs over time, and external events and shocks that can shift the balance of power among them. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|