Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Perceptual Dialectology× | Matched-Guise Technique× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja | Isimu | Isimu |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1989 | 1960 |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | Dennis R. Preston (building on Dutch and Japanese folk-dialectology traditions) | Wallace Lambert and colleagues |
| Aina≠ | Folk-linguistic method for studying non-linguists' perceptions of dialects | Indirect experimental measure of language attitudes |
| Chanzo asilia≠ | Preston, D. R. (1989). Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists' Views of Areal Linguistics. Foris. ISBN: 9789067654487 | Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 44–51. DOI ↗ |
| Majina mbadala | Folk Dialectology, Perceptual Dialect Mapping, Draw-a-Map Dialectology | Matched Guise Test, Matched-Guise Experiment, Language Attitude Matched Guise |
| Zinazohusiana≠ | 4 | 2 |
| Muhtasari≠ | Perceptual dialectology studies what ordinary, non-linguist speakers believe about language variation: where they think different dialects are spoken, what those dialects sound like, and how correct, pleasant, or different they judge them to be. Developed in its modern form by Dennis R. Preston in the 1980s, it is a branch of folk linguistics that treats lay perceptions as data in their own right rather than as errors to be corrected. Through draw-a-map tasks, dialect ranking, and identification exercises, it reveals the mental maps and social evaluations that shape how people experience the linguistic landscape around them. | The matched-guise technique is an indirect experimental method for measuring attitudes toward languages, dialects, and accents. Developed by Wallace Lambert and colleagues in 1960, it has the same bilingual or bidialectal speaker record the same passage in two or more language varieties ('guises'); listeners, believing they are hearing different speakers, rate each recording on personality and status traits. Because the voice, content, and delivery are held constant, any differences in the ratings can be attributed to listeners' attitudes toward the variety itself. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|