ScholarGate
Msaidizi

Linganisha mbinu

Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.

National Congregations Study Method×RELTRAD Affiliation Classification×
NyanjaSociology Of ReligionSociology Of Religion
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Mwaka wa asili19992000
MwanzilishiMark Chaves and colleaguesBrian Steensland, Jerry Z. Park, Mark D. Regnerus, Lynn D. Robinson, W. Bradford Wilcox & Robert D. Woodberry
AinaHypernetwork (multiplicity) sampling design for congregationsClassification/coding scheme for religious affiliation
Chanzo asiliaChaves, M., Konieczny, M. E., Beyerlein, K., & Barman, E. (1999). The National Congregations Study: Background, Methods, and Selected Results. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38(4), 458-476. DOI ↗Steensland, B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M. D., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art. Social Forces, 79(1), 291-318. DOI ↗
Majina mbadalaHypernetwork Congregation Sampling, Congregation Census Methodology, NCS Hypernetwork Method, Multiplicity Sampling of CongregationsReligious Tradition Coding, RELTRAD Scheme, Denominational Classification Scheme, Religious Affiliation Coding
Zinazohusiana33
MuhtasariThe National Congregations Study (NCS) method solves a hard sampling problem: there is no complete list of all the congregations in a country, so they cannot be sampled directly. Mark Chaves and colleagues addressed this with hypernetwork (multiplicity) sampling - drawing a representative sample of individuals, asking those who attend services to name their congregation, and treating each named congregation as a sampled unit. Because a congregation is named in proportion to the number of people who attend it, this procedure automatically yields a sample of congregations with probability proportional to size, from which leaders are then interviewed. First fielded in 1998 and described in the 1999 Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion article, and repeated in later waves summarized in Chaves and Eagle's 2015 report, the NCS has become the standard way to produce nationally representative data on American congregations.Religious affiliation classification is the task of turning hundreds of detailed denominational responses on a survey into a small, analytically useful set of religious traditions. The dominant scheme, RELTRAD, was proposed by Brian Steensland and colleagues in their 2000 Social Forces article 'The Measure of American Religion,' which criticized earlier classifications as historically and theologically incoherent and offered seven categories grounded in the development of American religious traditions: evangelical Protestant, mainline Protestant, Black Protestant, Roman Catholic, Jewish, other faiths, and no religion. By sorting respondents into traditions that share a meaningful religious heritage rather than into ad hoc groupings, RELTRAD became the standard variable through which sociologists relate religion to politics, family, and social attitudes.
ScholarGateSeti ya data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED

Nenda kwenye utafutaji Pakua slaidi

ScholarGateLinganisha mbinu: National Congregations Study Method · RELTRAD Affiliation Classification. Imepatikana 2026-06-24 kutoka https://scholargate.app/sw/compare