Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Uchanganuzi wa Ki-taasisi kwa Misingi ya Kesi Nyingi× | Utafiti Shirikishi wa Kiutamaduni× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja | Mbinu za Kimaelezo | Mbinu za Kimaelezo |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1987 (IE foundation); multi-case application developed through 1990s–2000s | 1990s–2000s |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | Dorothy E. Smith (institutional ethnography); multi-site adaptation by IE practitioners | Dorothy E. Smith (IE); participatory variant developed by Janet Rankin, Marie Campbell, and others in health and social sciences |
| Aina≠ | Qualitative multi-site research design | Qualitative research design |
| Chanzo asilia | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105690 | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 |
| Majina mbadala≠ | multi-site institutional ethnography, comparative institutional ethnography, multi-case IE, multiple-site IE | participatory IE, community-based institutional ethnography, collaborative institutional ethnography |
| Zinazohusiana | 6 | 6 |
| Muhtasari≠ | Multiple case-based institutional ethnography combines Dorothy E. Smith's institutional ethnography with a multi-site case structure, enabling researchers to trace how the same ruling relations, texts, and institutional processes operate across two or more distinct organizational or community settings. By holding the analytical framework constant while varying the site, this design reveals both the trans-local reach of ruling apparatus and the locally specific ways people navigate institutional coordination. | Participatory Institutional Ethnography (PIE) combines Dorothy Smith's institutional ethnography with participatory research principles, positioning community members or service users as co-researchers who investigate how institutional relations, ruling texts, and organizational practices shape and often constrain their everyday lives. The approach aims both to produce knowledge about institutional coordination and to generate actionable change through collaborative inquiry. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|