ScholarGate
Msaidizi

Linganisha mbinu

Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.

Nafasi za Kulinganisha (CEM / Kulinganisha Bora / Kulinganisha kwa Vinasaba)×Athari za Matibabu Zisizo Fanana (CATE / Meta-Wajifunzi)×
NyanjaUhitimisho wa KisababishiUhitimisho wa Kisababishi
FamiliaRegression modelRegression model
Mwaka wa asili20122018
MwanzilishiIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)Wager & Athey (causal forest); Künzel et al. (meta-learners)
AinaMatching for causal inferenceCausal machine-learning framework
Chanzo asiliaIacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Wager, S. & Athey, S. (2018). Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forests. Journal of the American Statistical Association. DOI ↗
Majina mbadalacoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEMconditional average treatment effect, CATE, meta-learners, causal forest
Zinazohusiana55
MuhtasariMatching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.Heterogeneous Treatment Effects is a machine-learning framework that estimates how a treatment effect varies across individuals — the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). It bundles meta-learner strategies such as the T-Learner, S-Learner, X-Learner and R-Learner alongside the causal forest of Wager and Athey (2018) and Künzel et al. (2019).
ScholarGateSeti ya data
  1. v1
  2. 2 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED

Nenda kwenye utafutaji Pakua slaidi

ScholarGateLinganisha mbinu: Matching Methods · Heterogeneous Treatment Effects. Imepatikana 2026-06-18 kutoka https://scholargate.app/sw/compare