ScholarGate
Msaidizi

Linganisha mbinu

Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.

Lived Religion Ethnography×Religious Vitality Index×
NyanjaSociology Of ReligionSociology Of Religion
FamiliaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Mwaka wa asili20081994
MwanzilishiMeredith B. McGuire (synthesis); Robert OrsiLaurence R. Iannaccone
AinaEthnographic fieldwork on everyday religious practiceIndex/model of religious group strength via strictness
Chanzo asiliaMcGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780195368338Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). Why Strict Churches Are Strong. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1180-1211. DOI ↗
Majina mbadalaEveryday Religion Ethnography, Lived Religion Fieldwork, Religion-as-Practiced Ethnography, Vernacular Religion FieldworkChurch Strength Index, Strictness-Vitality Measure, Religious Group Strength Model, Free-Rider Vitality Index
Zinazohusiana33
MuhtasariLived religion ethnography studies religion as people actually practice it in everyday life rather than as official doctrine, institutional membership, or survey-reported belief. Synthesized by Meredith McGuire in Lived Religion: Faith and Practice in Everyday Life (2008) and shaped by historians such as Robert Orsi, the approach turns attention from what churches teach and what censuses count to what individuals do - the prayers, objects, rituals, healing practices, and improvised devotions that fill ordinary days and often cut across or ignore official boundaries. Through participant observation and in-depth interviews, the ethnographer documents this embodied, material, and frequently idiosyncratic religion, revealing a far messier and more creative religious life than membership statistics or doctrinal statements suggest.The religious vitality index operationalizes Laurence Iannaccone's celebrated argument, in his 1994 American Journal of Sociology article 'Why Strict Churches Are Strong,' that demanding religious groups are often the most vital. The seeming paradox dissolves once religion is viewed as a collective good vulnerable to free-riding: if members can enjoy the fellowship, enthusiasm, and mutual support of a congregation while contributing little, average commitment erodes and the group weakens. Strictness - costly, distinctive demands such as dress codes, time obligations, and behavioral prohibitions - works as a screening device that drives out the half-hearted and raises the average commitment of those who remain. The vitality index therefore models a group's strength as a function of its strictness, its members' participation, and its capacity to retain and mobilize committed adherents.
ScholarGateSeti ya data
  1. v1
  2. 1 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Vyanzo
  3. PUBLISHED

Nenda kwenye utafutaji Pakua slaidi

ScholarGateLinganisha mbinu: Lived Religion Ethnography · Religious Vitality Index. Imepatikana 2026-06-25 kutoka https://scholargate.app/sw/compare