Linganisha mbinu
Pitia mbinu ulizochagua bega kwa bega; safu zinazotofautiana zinaangaziwa.
| Utafiti wa Ki-Autoethnografia wa Ki-Shambani× | Autoethnography× | |
|---|---|---|
| Nyanja | Mbinu za Kimaelezo | Mbinu za Kimaelezo |
| Familia | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Mwaka wa asili≠ | 1990s–2000s | Late 20th century (term coined 1979; method consolidated 1990s–2000s) |
| Mwanzilishi≠ | Ellis, Adams, and Bochner; building on autoethnography foundations by Carolyn Ellis and Arthur Bochner | Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Norman Denzin (prominent theorists); David Hayano coined the term in 1979 |
| Aina≠ | Qualitative research design | Qualitative research method |
| Chanzo asilia≠ | Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗ | Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759100947 |
| Majina mbadala | field autoethnography, site-based autoethnography, embodied field autoethnography, FBAE | auto-ethnography, AE, personal narrative research, self-ethnography |
| Zinazohusiana | 6 | 6 |
| Muhtasari≠ | Field-based autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher immerses themselves in a specific physical or social setting and draws on their own lived experience within that field to produce analytically reflexive accounts. It blends the systematic observational practices of ethnographic fieldwork with the first-person introspective voice of autoethnography, generating knowledge that is simultaneously personal, cultural, and contextually grounded. | Autoethnography is a qualitative research method in which the researcher uses systematic self-reflection and personal narrative to examine their own experiences within a cultural, social, or organizational context. By treating the self as both subject and instrument, autoethnography connects individual lived experience to broader cultural patterns, making personal stories analytically and socially significant. It bridges autobiography and ethnography, producing accounts that are simultaneously evocative and scholarly. |
| ScholarGateSeti ya data ↗ |
|
|