Linganisha mbinu

	Uhalali wa Maudhui katika Upimaji Unaoendeshwa na Kompyuta kwa Kubadilika (CAT)	Uthibitisho wa Dhana
Nyanja	Saikometriki	Saikometriki
Familia	Latent structure	Latent structure
Mwaka wa asili	1975 / 1980	1955
Mwanzilishi	Lawshe (content validity); Lord & Weiss (CAT framework)	Lee J. Cronbach & Paul E. Meehl
Aina	Validity evaluation / test design	Validity evaluation framework
Chanzo asilia	Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575.	Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302.
Majina mbadala	CAT content validity, adaptive item bank content coverage, content balancing in CAT, CAT blueprint validity	construct validation, factorial validity, nomological validity evidence, validity of interpretation
Zinazohusiana	6	6
Muhtasari	Content validity in computerized adaptive testing (CAT) ensures that an adaptively administered assessment adequately samples the intended content domain despite delivering only a subset of items to each examinee. It integrates classical content validity methods with CAT-specific item bank design and content balancing algorithms to guarantee representative domain coverage at both the item bank and the individual test level.	Construct validity is the degree to which a test or scale actually measures the theoretical construct it is intended to measure. Introduced by Cronbach and Meehl in 1955, it is the central validity concern in psychological and educational measurement, evaluated by accumulating multiple lines of empirical and logical evidence rather than by any single statistical test.