Public Goods Game
The public goods game is the canonical multi-person social dilemma used to study cooperation. Each member of a group is endowed with money and simultaneously decides how much to keep privately and how much to contribute to a common pool; the pool is multiplied and split equally among all members regardless of contribution. Because the marginal per-capita return is less than one but the group return exceeds one, every individual is privately better off free-riding while the group is collectively better off if all contribute -- the defining tension of a social dilemma. Experiments consistently show people contribute well above the self-interested zero, but contributions decay over repeated rounds unless institutions intervene. Fehr and Gachter's influential demonstration that allowing players to pay to punish free-riders restores and sustains high cooperation made the paradigm central to research on norms, altruistic punishment, and collective action.
Läs hela metoden
Logga in med ett kostnadsfritt konto för att läsa avsnittet.
Metodkarta
Närområdet av besläktade metoder — välj en nod för att utforska.
Källor
- Fehr, E., & Gachter, S. (2000). Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980-994. DOI: 10.1257/aer.90.4.980 ↗
- Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., & McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History. Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1), 122-142. DOI: 10.1006/game.1995.1027 ↗
Så citerar du den här sidan
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Public Goods Game (Voluntary Contribution Mechanism). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sv/social-psychology/public-goods-game
Vilken metod?
Placera den här metoden bredvid sina närmaste släktingar och läs dem sida vid sida — biblioteket lägger fram böckerna på bordet; valet är ditt.
- Minimal Group ParadigmSocialpsykologi↔ jämför
- Social Relations ModelSocialpsykologi↔ jämför
- Trust GameSocialpsykologi↔ jämför
Refereras av
Liknande metoder
Hittade du ett fel på sidan? Rapportera eller föreslå en rättelse →