Metodbevispost

Most Different Systems Design

The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Källpost

Citat kopierade ordagrant från metodens källpost. Ingen verifiering på källnivå härleds från dem.

Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement)

Taxonomisk metodpost · process-pipeline / political-science

Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. · ISBN 9780471701422
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. · DOI 10.1177/1065912907313077
Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. · ISBN 9780521676564

Öppna fullständig metod

Kuraterade påståenden

Påståenden lagrade i bevisloggen, var och en med sin egen bedömning.

Inga kuraterade påståenden ännu

Denna vy hittar inte på en påståendebedömning när loggen saknar en.

Relaterade metoder

Genererade från metodgrafen och visade som maskinföreslagna relationer – inga bevispåståenden härleds.

Taxonomic bucketMost Similar Systems Designmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.See alsoProcess Tracingmachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyQualitative Comparative Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.