Metodbevispost

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Sources recorded, not reviewed

Källpost

Citat kopierade ordagrant från metodens källpost. Ingen verifiering på källnivå härleds från dem.

Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)

Taxonomisk metodpost · process-pipeline / science-technology-studies

Öppna fullständig metod

Kuraterade påståenden

Påståenden lagrade i bevisloggen, var och en med sin egen bedömning.

Inga kuraterade påståenden ännu

Denna vy hittar inte på en påståendebedömning när loggen saknar en.

Relaterade metoder

Genererade från metodgrafen och visade som maskinföreslagna relationer – inga bevispåståenden härleds.

Same method familyActor-Network Theory Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familyBoundary-Work Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySocial Construction of Technologymachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.Same method familySociotechnical Imaginaries Analysismachine-suggested · Relational suggestion, not evidence.