ScholarGate
Assistent

Jämför metoder

Granska de valda metoderna sida vid sida; rader som skiljer sig är markerade.

Conover-Iman Post-Hoc Test×Dunns multipeljämförelsetest×
ÄmnesområdeStatistikStatistik
FamiljRegression modelHypothesis test
Ursprungsår19791964
UpphovspersonConover & ImanOlive Jean Dunn
TypNonparametric post-hoc multiple comparisonNonparametric pairwise comparison
UrsprungskällaConover, W. J. & Iman, R. L. (1979). On Multiple-Comparisons Procedures. Technical Report LA-7677-MS, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. link ↗Dunn, O.J. (1964). Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. DOI ↗
AliasConover-Iman post-hoc test, Conover post-hoc test, Conover-Iman Post-Hoc TestiDunn's post-hoc test, Kruskal-Wallis post-hoc, Dunn Testi — Kruskal-Wallis Post-Hoc
Närliggande35
SammanfattningThe Conover-Iman test is a rank-based post-hoc procedure, introduced by Conover and Iman in 1979, that identifies which pairs of groups differ after a significant Kruskal-Wallis or Friedman test. It builds a t-style statistic on the pooled ranks and is generally more powerful than the comparable Dunn test.Dunn's test is a nonparametric post-hoc procedure introduced by Olive Jean Dunn in 1964 to identify which specific pairs of groups differ significantly after a Kruskal-Wallis test has returned a significant overall result. It compares groups pairwise using rank sums and applies a multiple-comparison correction — most commonly Bonferroni or Holm — to control the family-wise error rate.
ScholarGateDatamängd
  1. v1
  2. 2 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Källor
  3. PUBLISHED

Gå till sökningen Ladda ner bildspel

ScholarGateJämför metoder: Conover-Iman Test · Dunn Test. Hämtad 2026-06-18 från https://scholargate.app/sv/compare