Jämför metoder

	Komparativ konstruktivistisk grundad teori	Jämförande Grounded Theory – Teoriutveckling över Kontext
Ämnesområde	Kvalitativa metoder	Kvalitativa metoder
Familj	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Ursprungsår	2000s (Charmaz 2000; extended comparatively through 2006–2014)	1967 (base); comparative application formalised from the 1980s onward
Upphovsperson	Kathy Charmaz (constructivist strand); comparative application developed in qualitative methodology literature	Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss (grounded theory base); comparative extension developed by multiple scholars
Typ	Qualitative comparative research design	Qualitative comparative research design
Ursprungskälla	Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973133	Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. ISBN: 978-0202302607
Alias	Comparative CGT, cross-group constructivist grounded theory, comparative Charmaz grounded theory, multi-site constructivist grounded theory	cross-site grounded theory, multi-group grounded theory, comparative GT, grounded theory comparative analysis
Närliggande	6	6
Sammanfattning	Comparative Constructivist Grounded Theory combines Kathy Charmaz's constructivist strand of grounded theory with an explicit comparative design, deliberately collecting and analyzing data from two or more groups, settings, or time points to build a theory that accounts for variation and similarity across contexts. The constructivist perspective treats categories and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants rather than discovered objectively from data.	Comparative grounded theory applies the systematic inductive logic of grounded theory across two or more distinct groups, settings, or time points. Rather than generating a theory grounded in a single context, it builds theory that explains variation and similarity across contexts, producing conceptually richer and more transferable explanatory frameworks than single-site grounded theory studies.