ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineIndividual change statistics

Reliable Change Index

The Reliable Change Index (RCI) is a statistic that tells whether the change in an individual client's score on a measure, from before to after an intervention, is large enough that it is unlikely to be an artifact of the instrument's measurement error. Introduced by Neil Jacobson and Paula Truax in 1991 as one half of their two-part definition of clinically significant change, it converts a pre-post difference into a standardized value and compares it against a critical cutoff, typically 1.96, so that practitioners and researchers can classify each client as reliably improved, unchanged, or reliably deteriorated.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroПримените, упоредите, добијте смернице
Алати и ресурси
Preuzmi slajdove
Учите и истражујте
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte celu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.

Prijavite se

Mapa metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.

Izvori

  1. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
  2. Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17(3), 305–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80060-0

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/social-work/reliable-change-index

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.

Uporedi uporedo

Citirana u

ScholarGateReliable Change Index (Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/social-work/reliable-change-index · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026