ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineCartography of controversies

Controversy Mapping

Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroПримените, упоредите, добијте смернице
Алати и ресурси
Preuzmi slajdove
Учите и истражујте
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte celu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.

Prijavite se

Mapa metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.

Izvori

  1. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694
  2. Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.

Uporedi uporedo

Citirana u

ScholarGateControversy Mapping (Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies)). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026