Controversy Mapping
Controversy mapping is a descriptive method for exploring and representing socio-technical disputes while they are still open and unsettled, before they harden into accepted facts or stable technologies. Developed as a teaching practice by Bruno Latour and codified by Tommaso Venturini at the Sciences Po médialab, it asks the analyst to dive into the heat of a debate, follow the actors and their arguments without prematurely taking sides, and render the resulting complexity legible through maps and visualisations. It treats controversy not as a pathology to be resolved but as the privileged moment in which the social and the technical are visibly being assembled.
Pročitajte celu metodu
Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.
Mapa metoda
Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.
Izvori
- Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: how to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258-273. DOI: 10.1177/0963662509102694 ↗
- Venturini, T. (2012). Building on faults: how to represent controversies with digital methods. Public Understanding of Science, 21(7), 796-812. DOI: 10.1177/0963662510387558 ↗
Kako citirati ovu stranicu
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Controversy Mapping (Cartography of Scientific Controversies). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/science-technology-studies/controversy-mapping
Koja metoda?
Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.
- Actor-Network Theory AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ uporedi
- Boundary-Work AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ uporedi
- Social Construction of TechnologyScience Technology Studies↔ uporedi
- Sociotechnical Imaginaries AnalysisScience Technology Studies↔ uporedi
Citirana u
Сличне методе
Uočili ste grešku na ovoj stranici? Prijavite je ili predložite ispravku →