ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineBiblical exegesis / Gospel composition

Redaction Criticism

Redaction criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte) studies the biblical authors not as passive collectors of tradition but as genuine authors and theologians who shaped their inherited material to make a point. Where form criticism dissolved the Gospels into independent oral units, redaction criticism puts the spotlight back on the evangelist who selected, arranged, and edited those units. By comparing the final text with the sources and traditions behind it, the critic isolates the changes the author made, looks for a consistent pattern in those changes, and reads off the theological program that motivated them. Hans Conzelmann's 1953 study of Luke is the classic example, and Norman Perrin's 1969 primer What Is Redaction Criticism? introduced the method to English readers and articulated its logic.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroПримените, упоредите, добијте смернице
Алати и ресурси
Preuzmi slajdove
Учите и истражујте
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte celu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.

Prijavite se

Mapa metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.

Izvori

  1. Perrin, N. (1969). What Is Redaction Criticism? Philadelphia: Fortress Press. ISBN: 9780800601812
  2. Conzelmann, H. (1960). The Theology of St Luke (trans. G. Buswell). New York: Harper. [German 'Die Mitte der Zeit', 1953]. link

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/religious-studies/redaction-criticism

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.

Uporedi uporedo

Citirana u

ScholarGateRedaction Criticism (Redaction Criticism (Redaktionsgeschichte: Editorial Theology of the Final Author)). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/religious-studies/redaction-criticism · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026