Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Raspored procene tima za podršku× | Alat za procenu potreba u palijativnom zbrinjavanju× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Palijativna nega | Palijativna nega |
| Porodica | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1997 | 2004 |
| Tvorac≠ | Baker, Speck, and Cohen | Developed by palliative care researchers and clinicians to address systematic gap assessment |
| Tip≠ | Clinician-rated observational scale | Clinician-rated interview or patient self-report |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Baker, A., Speck, P., & Cohen, D. (1997). Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS): Development of a new instrument for the evaluation of support to patients and families in palliative care. Journal of Palliative Care, 13(2), 39–45. link ↗ | Gardiner, C., Brereton, L., Frey, R., Wilkinson, J., & Ingleton, C. (2011). Exploring the financial impact of palliative care on patients and families. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care, 5(1), 58–65. link ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | STAS, STAS-A | NAPC, Needs Assessment Palliative Care |
| Srodne | 5 | 5 |
| Sažetak≠ | The Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS) is a clinician-rated observational instrument assessing the impact of palliative care support on patients with advanced illness and their families across seven key domains: pain, symptoms, anxiety, family well-being, communication, and support adequacy. Developed by Baker, Speck, and Cohen in 1997, the STAS has become a standard quality-of-life outcome measure in community palliative care, hospice, and research, enabling teams to systematically monitor the effectiveness of their interventions and identify patients and families in crisis. | The Needs Assessment Tool for Palliative Care (NAPC) is a comprehensive, multidomain assessment framework designed to systematically identify unmet palliative and supportive care needs in patients with advanced illness and their families. Rather than a numerical scale, the NAPC functions as a structured clinical interview and resource allocation guide, helping palliative care teams deliver holistic, person-centered care by addressing physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and practical dimensions simultaneously. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|