Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Robusna nomološka valditnost× | Diskriminantna validnost× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Psihometrija | Psihometrija |
| Porodica | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1955 | 1959 |
| Tvorac≠ | Cronbach & Meehl (seminal framework); later extended by Shadish, Cook, and Campbell | Donald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske |
| Tip≠ | Validity assessment / construct validation | Validity evidence / psychometric evaluation |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Cronbach, L. J. & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | nomological network validity, robust validity testing, nomological validity, RNV | discriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity |
| Srodne | 5 | 5 |
| Sažetak≠ | Robust nomological validity evaluates whether a psychological construct relates to theoretically expected variables in the predicted directions, using statistically robust estimation methods that remain trustworthy when distributional assumptions are violated. It tests the construct's place within its nomological network — the web of theoretical relationships that define its meaning. | Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|