ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Skala političke efikasnosti×Skala političkog poverenja×Skala cinizma birača×
OblastPolitička psihologijaPolitička psihologijaPolitička psihologija
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka196919741960
TvoracRichard Niemi, Steven Craig, Albert BanduraArthur H. MillerAngus Campbell et al.
TipSelf-reportSelf-reportSelf-report
Temeljni izvorNiemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407-1413. DOI ↗Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964-1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951-972. DOI ↗Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
Drugi naziviPolitical Efficacy, Internal Efficacy, External EfficacyPTS, Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) Trust ModulePCS, Political Efficacy Cynicism, Electoral System Cynicism
Srodne333
SažetakPolitical efficacy measures sense of personal agency and power in the political system, encompassing both internal efficacy (belief in own political competence and understanding) and external efficacy (belief that the political system is responsive to citizen input). Rooted in Bandura's self-efficacy theory (1977) and developed for political contexts by Niemi, Craig, and colleagues (1969 onwards), the measure explains why some citizens feel empowered to engage in politics while others feel powerless. High-efficacy citizens are substantially more likely to participate, contact representatives, and vote; low-efficacy citizens withdraw from politics and are susceptible to anti-democratic appeals.The Political Trust Scale measures citizen confidence in government institutions, elected officials, and the political system's responsiveness and fairness. Pioneered by Miller (1974) and operationalized across comparative electoral studies (CSES Module 5), the scale captures both diffuse trust (in the political system generally) and specific trust (in particular institutions such as parliament or the executive). It is central to understanding democratic legitimacy, political engagement, and support for democratic institutions.The Voter Cynicism Scale measures citizen skepticism and disillusionment regarding the political process, including beliefs that the electoral system is rigged, politicians are self-serving, and voting does not matter. The measure captures a pessimistic orientation toward electoral democracy distinct from distrust in institutions (which can coexist with belief in democratic potential) or political alienation. Rooted in Campbell et al.'s American Voter (1960) tradition of measuring political efficacy and cynicism, the scale remains central to understanding voter turnout decline, support for populist alternatives, and democratic legitimacy crises.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Political Efficacy Scale · Political Trust Scale · Voter Cynicism Scale. Preuzeto 2026-06-20 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare