ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Petrografska analiza×Klasifikacija masiva stena×
OblastGeonaukeGeonauke
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka18581974
TvoracHenry Clifton SorbyBieniawski and Barton
Tipcompositional characterization pipelineengineering geology assessment pipeline
Temeljni izvorTucker, M. E. (2003). Sedimentary Rocks in the Field: A Color Guide (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗Bieniawski, Z. T. (1989). Engineering Rock Mass Classifications. John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
Drugi nazivimicroscopy analysis, thin section analysis, modal composition determinationRMR system, Q-system classification, rock quality designation
Srodne54
SažetakPetrographic analysis is the microscopic examination of rock thin sections to determine mineral composition, grain size, texture, and diagenetic alteration. Pioneered by Sorby in 1858, this method remains the gold standard for understanding lithology and has evolved to include quantitative image analysis and cathodoluminescence. Petrographic data anchor well-log interpretation, validate seismic velocity models, and constrain paleoenvironmental and diagenetic histories.Rock mass classification is the systematic assessment of rock quality and mechanical behavior in engineering geology, combining field observations of jointing, weathering, and strength into a numerical index. Pioneered by Bieniawski (RMR system, 1974) and Barton (Q-system, 1974), these methods enable rapid site assessment and guide design of excavations, dams, and slopes. Classification bridges the gap between small laboratory samples and large field-scale behavior.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Petrographic Analysis · Rock Mass Classification. Preuzeto 2026-06-17 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare