ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Učesničko posmatranje×Kriterijumi poverenja u kvalitativnim istraživanjima×
OblastKvalitativno istraživanjeKvalitativno istraživanje
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka19221985
TvoracBronislaw MalinowskiYvonna Lincoln and Egon Guba
TipMethodFramework
Temeljni izvorGeertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803924314
Drugi naziviethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observationtrustworthiness criteria, credibility, dependability, confirmability
Srodne44
SažetakParticipant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact.Trustworthiness is a framework for evaluating the quality and rigor of qualitative research, developed by Lincoln and Guba (1985) as an alternative to quantitative criteria (internal validity, external validity, reliability, objectivity). The framework comprises five criteria: credibility (findings are accurate and grounded in data), transferability (findings apply to other contexts), dependability (findings are consistent and defensible), confirmability (findings reflect the data and participants' perspectives, not researcher bias), and authenticity (research reflects diverse viewpoints and promotes understanding). This framework has become standard for assessing qualitative research across disciplines and guides researchers in designing and reporting rigorous qualitative studies.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 4 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Participant Observation · Trustworthiness Criteria in Qualitative Research. Preuzeto 2026-06-19 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare