ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Analiza materijalnih tokova (MFA)×Računanje ekološkog otiska×
OblastOdrživostOdrživost
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka20041996
TvoracBrunner & RechbergerMathis Wackernagel & William Rees
TipQuantitative systems accounting methodEnvironmental accounting indicator
Temeljni izvorBrunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Lewis Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-56670-604-9Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers. ISBN: 978-0-86571-312-3
Drugi naziviSubstance Flow Analysis, Bulk-MFA, Material Flux Analysis, Malzeme Akış AnaliziEFA, Ecological Footprint Analysis, Biocapacity Accounting, Ekolojik Ayak İzi
Srodne32
SažetakMaterial Flow Analysis (MFA) is a systematic method for quantifying the flows and stocks of materials within a defined system boundary over a specified time period. Introduced comprehensively by Paul H. Brunner and Helmut Rechberger in their 2004 handbook, MFA applies mass-balance principles to track how raw materials, products, wastes, and emissions move through industrial, urban, or national metabolisms, enabling evidence-based resource management and waste policy.Ecological Footprint Accounting (EFA) is a resource accounting framework that measures how much biologically productive land and water area a human population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb the waste it generates. Introduced by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees in 1996, it compares human demand on nature against Earth's regenerative capacity, expressed in standardized global hectares (gha).
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Material Flow Analysis · Ecological Footprint. Preuzeto 2026-06-18 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare