Uporedite metode
Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.
| Usklajeni Proporcionalni Rizici po Cox-u× | Analiza Kaplan-Meier× | |
|---|---|---|
| Oblast | Epidemiologija | Epidemiologija |
| Porodica | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| Godina nastanka≠ | 1972 (Cox model); matched extension widely adopted 1970s–1980s | 1958 |
| Tvorac≠ | D. R. Cox (Cox model, 1972); stratification extension for matched designs by subsequent methodologists including D. C. Thomas | Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier |
| Tip≠ | Semi-parametric survival regression for matched data | Nonparametric survival estimator |
| Temeljni izvor≠ | Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life-tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 34(2), 187–202. DOI ↗ | Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958). Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53(282), 457–481. DOI ↗ |
| Drugi nazivi | stratified Cox regression, conditional Cox model, matched survival analysis, Cox model for matched pairs | KM analysis, KM estimator, product-limit estimator, Kaplan-Meier curve |
| Srodne≠ | 4 | 5 |
| Sažetak≠ | Matched Cox proportional hazards is a survival analysis method that extends the Cox regression model to appropriately handle data arising from matched study designs — matched cohorts or matched case-control studies with time-to-event outcomes. By stratifying the partial likelihood by matched set, the method eliminates confounding from matching factors without estimating their baseline hazard, yielding valid hazard ratio estimates that are free from matching-induced bias. | Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis is a nonparametric method for estimating the survival function from time-to-event data. Introduced by Kaplan and Meier in 1958, it produces the classic step-function survival curve that shows the probability of surviving beyond each observed event time, correctly accounting for censored observations — participants who left the study or had not yet experienced the event by the end of follow-up. It is one of the most widely used techniques in clinical and epidemiological research. |
| ScholarGateSkup podataka ↗ |
|
|