ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Računanje ekološkog otiska×Analiza materijalnih tokova (MFA)×
OblastOdrživostOdrživost
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka19962004
TvoracMathis Wackernagel & William ReesBrunner & Rechberger
TipEnvironmental accounting indicatorQuantitative systems accounting method
Temeljni izvorWackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society Publishers. ISBN: 978-0-86571-312-3Brunner, P. H., & Rechberger, H. (2004). Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. Lewis Publishers. ISBN: 978-1-56670-604-9
Drugi naziviEFA, Ecological Footprint Analysis, Biocapacity Accounting, Ekolojik Ayak İziSubstance Flow Analysis, Bulk-MFA, Material Flux Analysis, Malzeme Akış Analizi
Srodne23
SažetakEcological Footprint Accounting (EFA) is a resource accounting framework that measures how much biologically productive land and water area a human population requires to produce the resources it consumes and to absorb the waste it generates. Introduced by Mathis Wackernagel and William Rees in 1996, it compares human demand on nature against Earth's regenerative capacity, expressed in standardized global hectares (gha).Material Flow Analysis (MFA) is a systematic method for quantifying the flows and stocks of materials within a defined system boundary over a specified time period. Introduced comprehensively by Paul H. Brunner and Helmut Rechberger in their 2004 handbook, MFA applies mass-balance principles to track how raw materials, products, wastes, and emissions move through industrial, urban, or national metabolisms, enabling evidence-based resource management and waste policy.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Ecological Footprint · Material Flow Analysis. Preuzeto 2026-06-18 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare