ScholarGate
Asistent

Uporedite metode

Pregledajte izabrane metode jednu pored druge; redovi koji se razlikuju su istaknuti.

Detekcija arhitektonskih mirisa×Model za predviđanje defekata×
OblastSoftversko inženjerstvoSoftversko inženjerstvo
PorodicaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Godina nastanka20092005
TvoracMartin Fowler and García et al.Thomas Ostrand, Elaine Weyuker, Robert Bell
Tippattern-based analysismachine learning model
Temeljni izvorFowler, M. (2018). Code smell. Martin Fowler's Website. link ↗Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J., & Bell, R. M. (2005). Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 31(4), 340–355. DOI ↗
Drugi nazividesign smell detection, architectural debt analysis, system quality assessmentfault prediction, bug prediction, defect classification
Srodne44
SažetakArchitecture smells are recurring patterns in system structure that indicate potential design problems. Introduced by García et al. (2009), these patterns signal violations of architectural principles (modularity, independence, abstraction) at system scale. Detection combines code metrics, dependency analysis, and pattern recognition to identify smells early, guiding refactoring and architectural improvements.Defect prediction models forecast the likelihood of software faults in code modules using statistical or machine learning approaches. Pioneered by Ostrand, Weyuker, and Bell (2005), these models correlate code metrics (complexity, churn, coupling) with historical defect data to identify high-risk components. Organizations use predictions to allocate testing resources, guide code review, and prioritize refactoring.
ScholarGateSkup podataka
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Izvori
  3. PUBLISHED

Idi na pretragu Preuzmi slajdove

ScholarGateUporedite metode: Architecture Smell Detection · Defect Prediction Model. Preuzeto 2026-06-18 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/compare