ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineZooarchaeology / faunal quantification

Number of Identified Specimens (NISP)

The number of identified specimens, universally abbreviated NISP, is the most basic quantitative measure in zooarchaeology: a simple count of every bone or bone fragment that an analyst can identify to a taxon. It is the first number computed for almost any faunal assemblage because it is fast, transparent, additive across deposits, and reproducible. Yet, as Reitz and Wing emphasize and Lyman dissects in detail, NISP is an observation count rather than an animal count, and it is distorted by fragmentation, by recovery technique, and by the fact that fragments of a single bone are not independent of one another. Understanding precisely what NISP does and does not measure is the foundation on which all other faunal abundance estimates rest.

Otvorite u MethodMindUskoroПримените, упоредите, добијте смернице
Алати и ресурси
Preuzmi slajdove
Учите и истражујте
VideoUskoro

Pročitajte celu metodu

Samo za članove

Prijavite se besplatnim nalogom da biste pročitali ovaj odeljak.

Prijavite se

Mapa metoda

Okruženje srodnih metoda — izaberite čvor da biste istraživali.

Izvori

  1. Reitz, E. J., & Wing, E. S. (2008). Zooarchaeology (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521673938
  2. Lyman, R. L. (1994). Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521458405

Kako citirati ovu stranicu

ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Number of Identified Specimens (NISP): Counting Identified Faunal Specimens. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sr/archaeology/number-identified-specimens

Koja metoda?

Postavite ovu metodu pored njoj najbližih srodnika i čitajte ih uporedo — biblioteka polaže knjige na sto; izbor je na vama.

Uporedi uporedo

Citirana u

ScholarGateNumber of Identified Specimens (NISP) (Number of Identified Specimens (NISP): Counting Identified Faunal Specimens). Preuzeto 2026-06-24 sa https://scholargate.app/sr/archaeology/number-identified-specimens · Skup podataka: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026