Archaeological Ethics and Heritage Management
Archaeological ethics and heritage management address the responsibilities of archaeologists toward the past, the public, and descendant communities, and the systems that protect and manage the archaeological record.
Definition
The study of the ethical obligations of archaeological practice and of the legal and institutional management of archaeological heritage, including stewardship, community engagement, and the protection of sites and remains.
Scope
This topic covers the ethical and political dimensions of archaeology: stewardship of finite resources, repatriation and the treatment of human remains, relations with Indigenous and descendant communities, the antiquities trade and looting, and the frameworks of cultural resource management and heritage legislation through which archaeology is practiced and the record preserved.
Core questions
- To whom are archaeologists responsible, and what does stewardship require?
- How should human remains and sacred objects be treated and repatriated?
- How are descendant and Indigenous communities involved in archaeology?
- How do heritage law and management protect the archaeological record?
Key theories
- Stewardship and the ethics of practice
- The principle that archaeologists are stewards of a finite, non-renewable record on behalf of present and future publics, grounding duties of preservation, accountability, and ethical conduct.
- Heritage as a political and social construct
- Laurajane Smith's argument that heritage is not simply inherited objects but a discourse and social practice through which meanings and identities are constructed and contested in the present.
History
Ethical and heritage concerns moved to the center of archaeology in the late 20th century, driven by Indigenous claims, repatriation legislation such as the United States NAGPRA, and the growth of rescue and cultural resource management. Debates over looting, the antiquities trade, and the politics of heritage have since become integral to professional practice and theory.
Debates
- Ownership and control of the past
- Scholars and communities debate who owns and may interpret archaeological heritage and human remains, balancing scientific access against the rights and values of descendant and Indigenous groups.
Key figures
- Laurajane Smith
- John Carman
- Geoffrey Scarre
- Chris Scarre
Related topics
Seminal works
- smith2004
- scarrezubrow2004
- carman2002
Frequently asked questions
- What is cultural resource management?
- It is the management and protection of archaeological and heritage resources, often through legally mandated survey, assessment, and mitigation ahead of development projects.
- Why is repatriation an ethical issue in archaeology?
- Because museums and researchers hold human remains and sacred objects whose descendant communities may claim them, raising questions about consent, ownership, and respect that legislation such as NAGPRA addresses.