ScholarGate
Asistent
Process / pipelineIndividual change statistics

Reliable Change Index

The Reliable Change Index (RCI) is a statistic that tells whether the change in an individual client's score on a measure, from before to after an intervention, is large enough that it is unlikely to be an artifact of the instrument's measurement error. Introduced by Neil Jacobson and Paula Truax in 1991 as one half of their two-part definition of clinically significant change, it converts a pre-post difference into a standardized value and compares it against a critical cutoff, typically 1.96, so that practitioners and researchers can classify each client as reliably improved, unchanged, or reliably deteriorated.

Otvoriť v MethodMindČoskoroPoužiť, porovnať, získať usmernenie
Nástroje a zdroje
Stiahnuť snímky
Učiť sa a objavovať
VideoČoskoro

Prečítať celú metódu

Len pre členov

Ak si chcete prečítať túto sekciu, prihláste sa s bezplatným účtom.

Prihlásiť sa

Mapa metód

Okolie príbuzných metód — vyberte uzol na preskúmanie.

Zdroje

  1. Jacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12–19. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.59.1.12
  2. Christensen, L., & Mendoza, J. L. (1986). A method of assessing change in a single subject: An alteration of the RC index. Behavior Therapy, 17(3), 305–308. DOI: 10.1016/S0005-7894(86)80060-0

Ako citovať túto stránku

ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation. ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sk/social-work/reliable-change-index

Ktorá metóda?

Postavte túto metódu vedľa jej najbližších príbuzných a čítajte ich vedľa seba — knižnica vám knihy položí na stôl; voľba je na vás.

Porovnať vedľa seba

Odkazujú sem

ScholarGateReliable Change Index (Reliable Change Index for Individual Outcome Evaluation). Získané 2026-06-24 z https://scholargate.app/sk/social-work/reliable-change-index · Dátová sada: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20539026