Glock-Stark Religiosity Dimensions
The Glock-Stark framework, set out in Charles Glock and Rodney Stark's 1965 Religion and Society in Tension, recast religiosity from a single global trait into five analytically distinct dimensions of religious commitment: belief (ideological), practice (ritualistic), experience (experiential), knowledge (intellectual), and consequences (the effects of religion on everyday conduct). The core claim is that an individual can rank high on one dimension and low on another, so a one-number measure of 'how religious' someone is conceals more than it reveals. Operationally, each dimension is tapped by its own cluster of survey items, scaled separately, and the correlations among the dimensions are themselves an object of study. This multidimensional measurement model became the template for nearly all later psychometric work on religiousness.
Prečítať celú metódu
Ak si chcete prečítať túto sekciu, prihláste sa s bezplatným účtom.
Mapa metód
Okolie príbuzných metód — vyberte uzol na preskúmanie.
Zdroje
- Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1965). Religion and Society in Tension. Chicago: Rand McNally. link ↗
- Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religions, 3(3), 710-724. DOI: 10.3390/rel3030710 ↗
Ako citovať túto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 23). Glock-Stark Multidimensional Religiosity (Five Dimensions of Religious Commitment). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sk/religious-studies/glock-stark-religiosity
Ktorá metóda?
Postavte túto metódu vedľa jej najbližších príbuzných a čítajte ich vedľa seba — knižnica vám knihy položí na stôl; voľba je na vás.
- Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)Religious Studies↔ porovnať
- Faith Maturity ScaleReligious Studies↔ porovnať
- Religious Orientation Scale (ROS)Religious Studies↔ porovnať
Odkazujú sem
Podobné metódy
Našli ste na tejto stránke chybu? Nahláste ju alebo navrhnite opravu →