Most Different Systems Design
The most different systems design (MDSD) is a small-N comparative strategy that selects cases that differ on as many background characteristics as possible yet share the same outcome. If wildly dissimilar cases nonetheless converge on the same result, the explanation cannot lie in the many features on which they differ — it must lie in whatever they have in common. Grounded in John Stuart Mill's method of agreement and named by Przeworski and Teune, it is the mirror image of the most similar systems design and a staple of comparative politics.
Prečítať celú metódu
Ak si chcete prečítať túto sekciu, prihláste sa s bezplatným účtom.
Mapa metód
Okolie príbuzných metód — vyberte uzol na preskúmanie.
Zdroje
- Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. (1970). The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience. ISBN: 9780471701422
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308. DOI: 10.1177/1065912907313077 ↗
- Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9780521676564
Ako citovať túto stránku
ScholarGate. (2026, June 22). Most Different Systems Design (Comparative Method of Agreement). ScholarGate. https://scholargate.app/sk/political-science/most-different-systems-design
Ktorá metóda?
Postavte túto metódu vedľa jej najbližších príbuzných a čítajte ich vedľa seba — knižnica vám knihy položí na stôl; voľba je na vás.
- Most Similar Systems DesignPolitical Science↔ porovnať
- Procesné trasovaniePsychometria↔ porovnať
- Qualitative Comparative AnalysisPolitical Science↔ porovnať
Odkazujú sem
Podobné metódy
Našli ste na tejto stránke chybu? Nahláste ju alebo navrhnite opravu →