Innovation Ambidexterity Scale
Innovation Ambidexterity—the organizational capacity to simultaneously engage in exploration (pursuing radical, novel innovations) and exploitation (improving and extending existing products and processes)—is fundamental to sustained competitive advantage. March (1991) formalized this trade-off in Organization Science, arguing that organizations must balance the two to survive and thrive. Exploration alone leads to variety but insufficient returns; exploitation alone leads to competence traps and vulnerability to disruption. This scale, operationalized by He and Wong (2004) and extended by Jansen et al. (2006), measures organizational capability in both domains and the degree to which firms balance competing innovation imperatives.
Zdrojový záznam
Citácie skopírované doslovne zo zdrojového záznamu metódy. Nevyplýva z nich žiadne overenie na úrovni tvrdenia.
- March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87. · DOI 10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
- He, Z. L., & Wong, P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481–494. · DOI 10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
- Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661–1674. · DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Spracované tvrdenia
Tvrdenia uložené v registri dôkazov, každé s vlastným hodnotením.
Tento pohľad nevymýšľa hodnotenie tvrdenia, ak register žiadne nemá.
Súvisiace metódy
Vygenerované z grafu metód a zobrazené ako vzťahy navrhnuté strojom – nevyplýva z nich žiadne tvrdenie o dôkaze.