ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Wordfish Scaling×Ideal Point Estimation×
OdborPolitical SciencePolitical Science
RodinaLatent structureLatent structure
Rok vzniku20082004
TvorcaJonathan Slapin and Sven-Oliver ProkschClinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)
TypUnsupervised latent-position model for word-count dataLatent-variable spatial model of binary choice data
Pôvodný zdrojSlapin, J. B., & Proksch, S.-O. (2008). A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts. American Journal of Political Science, 52(3), 705–722. DOI ↗Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗
Ďalšie názvyWordfish text scaling, Poisson scaling of texts, Unsupervised text scaling, Wordfish position estimationIdeal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
Príbuzné44
ZhrnutieWordfish scaling is an unsupervised text-as-data method that estimates a single latent position for each political document — a party manifesto, a legislative speech, a press release — directly from its word frequencies, without any reference texts or hand coding. Introduced by Slapin and Proksch in 2008, it models word counts as draws from a Poisson distribution whose rate depends on a document position and word-specific parameters, recovering, for example, a left–right ordering of parties purely from how often each word appears in each text.Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Wordfish Scaling · Ideal Point Estimation. Získané 2026-06-25 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare