ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Analýza citlivosti pre kauzalitu vo výskume vzdelávania×Metódy párovania (CEM / optimálne / genetické)×
OdborKauzálna inferenciaKauzálna inferencia
RodinaRegression modelRegression model
Rok vzniku1983–20022012
TvorcaPaul R. Rosenbaum (formal framework); applied in education research by Briggs and othersIacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching)
TypCausal robustness / bias assessmentMatching for causal inference
Pôvodný zdrojRosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
Ďalšie názvyRosenbaum sensitivity analysis, hidden-bias sensitivity analysis, causal sensitivity analysis, SA for causal education studiescoarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM
Príbuzné65
ZhrnutieSensitivity analysis for causality in education research tests how robust a quasi-experimental finding is to unmeasured confounding. Rather than assuming all bias has been removed, it quantifies how large a hidden bias would need to be to overturn a causal conclusion — a critical safeguard when randomisation is impossible, which is common in educational settings.Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Sensitivity analysis for causality in education research · Matching Methods. Získané 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare