ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Technika nominálnych skupín×Obsahová analýza×Výskum zameraný na skupiny×
OdborKvalitatívne metódyKvalitatívne metódyKvalitatívne metódy
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1971Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 20181940s (sociological origin); modern applied form from the 1980s–1990s
TvorcaAndré L. Delbecq and Andrew H. Van de VenKlaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications researchRobert K. Merton (sociological precursor, 1940s); popularised in applied research by Richard A. Krueger
TypQualitative research methodQualitative / mixed-method research techniqueQualitative data collection method
Pôvodný zdrojDelbecq, A. L., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1971). A group process model for problem identification and program planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 7(4), 466–492. link ↗Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M.A. (2014). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (5th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483365244
Ďalšie názvyNGT, structured group process, nominal group process, priority-setting group methodİçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysisfocus group discussion, FGD, group interview, Odak Grup Araştırması
Príbuzné656
ZhrnutieThe Nominal Group Technique (NGT) is a structured group facilitation method designed to generate and prioritise ideas, problems, or solutions while ensuring equal participation from all members. Developed by Delbecq and Van de Ven in 1971, it combines silent individual idea generation with structured group discussion and systematic voting to produce a ranked list of priorities. Unlike unstructured focus groups, NGT prevents dominant voices from suppressing quieter participants, making it especially valuable for needs assessment, program planning, and stakeholder priority-setting in applied research and policy contexts.Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material.Focus group research is a qualitative data-collection method in which a trained moderator guides structured discussions with homogeneous groups of six to ten participants to explore ideas, attitudes, and perceptions on a defined topic. Developed from sociological roots in the 1940s and systematised for applied research by Krueger and Casey, the method leverages group interaction as a data source — revealing not just what people think, but how they negotiate and articulate views in a social setting.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Nominal Group Technique · Content Analysis · Focus Group. Získané 2026-06-18 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare