ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Analýza zhodných konkurenčných rizík×Zodpovedajúce skóre sklonu×
OdborEpidemiológiaŠtatistika vo výskume
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1999 (Fine-Gray model); extended to matched designs ~2010s1983
TvorcaFine & Gray (subdistribution hazard model); Austin, Lee & Fine (matched competing risks framework)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
TypObservational survival analysis with matching and competing eventsMethod
Pôvodný zdrojFine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999). A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 496–509. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
Ďalšie názvymatched Fine-Gray analysis, propensity-matched competing risks, matched cause-specific hazard analysis, matched subdistribution hazard analysisPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
Príbuzné43
ZhrnutieMatched competing risks analysis combines subject-level matching (e.g., propensity-score matching) with competing risks survival methods to estimate the cause-specific or subdistribution hazard of an event of interest while accounting for competing events that preclude the occurrence of that event. It is widely used in clinical and epidemiological observational studies where patients may die from causes other than the primary outcome of interest, and where treatment groups differ on baseline confounders.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Matched Competing Risks Analysis · Propensity Score Matching. Získané 2026-06-17 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare