Porovnať metódy

	Lesson Study (Collaborative Inquiry)	Formative Assessment
Odbor	Education	Education
Rodina	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
Rok vzniku	2006	1998
Tvorca	Japanese teaching tradition; introduced to the West by Stigler, Hiebert, Lewis & colleagues	Scriven (term); Bloom; Black & Wiliam (modern synthesis)
Typ	Cyclical, teacher-led professional development and practitioner inquiry process	Instructional process using evidence of learning to adapt teaching and feedback
Pôvodný zdroj	Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.	Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Ďalšie názvy	Jugyou Kenkyuu, Research Lesson Cycle, Collaborative Lesson Study, Japanese Lesson Study	Assessment for Learning, Classroom Formative Assessment, Feedback-Based Assessment, Embedded Formative Assessment
Príbuzné	3	4
Zhrnutie	Lesson study (jugyou kenkyuu) is a collaborative, cyclical form of teacher professional development and practitioner inquiry that originated in Japan. A team of teachers studies the curriculum, sets a shared learning goal, jointly designs a 'research lesson,' has one member teach it while the others observe students closely, and then debriefs against the evidence to revise the lesson and their understanding of teaching. Rather than improving a single lesson, its deeper aim is to build teachers' professional knowledge through disciplined, evidence-based collective inquiry.	Formative assessment, or assessment for learning, is the practice of gathering evidence of student understanding during instruction and using it immediately to adjust teaching and to give feedback that moves learning forward. Unlike summative assessment, which measures learning after the fact for grading or accountability, formative assessment is woven into the teaching cycle. Synthesized influentially by Black and Wiliam, it is defined not by the type of instrument but by whether the resulting evidence actually changes subsequent instruction and learning.