ScholarGate
Asistent

Porovnať metódy

Prezrite si vybrané metódy vedľa seba; riadky, ktoré sa líšia, sú zvýraznené.

Diaristický záznam z výskumu tvárou v tvár×Reflexívna tematická analýza×
OdborMetodológia dotazníkových prieskumovKvalitatívne metódy
RodinaProcess / pipelineProcess / pipeline
Rok vzniku1981–1989 (systematic articulation in qualitative fieldwork literature)2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
TvorcaRobert G. Burgess (systematic research diary in fieldwork); Mary Louise Holly (professional journal writing)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
TypQualitative data collection and reflexivity toolQualitative research method
Pôvodný zdrojHolly, M. L. (1989). Writing to Grow: Keeping a Personal-Professional Journal. Heinemann. ISBN: 978-0435084592Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
Ďalšie názvyin-person research journal, fieldwork reflexive diary, face-to-face researcher journal, in-person reflexive logRTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
Príbuzné66
ZhrnutieA face-to-face research diary is a systematic reflexive log maintained by the researcher during in-person fieldwork. Unlike participant diaries, this is the researcher's own running record of observations, analytic thoughts, methodological decisions, and emotional responses captured during or immediately after direct, embodied encounters with participants or field settings. It serves simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument within qualitative research.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateDátová sada
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 Zdroje
  3. PUBLISHED

Prejsť na hľadanie Stiahnuť snímky

ScholarGatePorovnať metódy: Face-to-face Research Diary · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Získané 2026-06-19 z https://scholargate.app/sk/compare